elz: (ada-tubes)
elz ([personal profile] elz) wrote in [community profile] intro_to_cs2009-11-19 05:49 pm
Entry tags:

Lecture 4

Link to video and handout + Problem set 3







Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 6


Revenge of the tickyboxes

View Answers

Finished lecture 4
6 (100.0%)

Finished problem set 3
1 (16.7%)



Also! I was thinking, Google Code has some handy code review and commenting features, and who doesn't love version control, right? *g* So I set up an intro-cs-dw Mercurial project over there. I've never actually used Mercurial before, but I like having excuses to learn new things.

To get set up:

1) Email or pm me or leave me a comment and I'll add you as a project committer.

2) Add a folder with your name on it and put your problem set solutions in there.

That way if you want to collaborate with someone or leave helpful feedback or read other people's code, it should be a little easier than using the DW comments.
exor674: Computer Science is my girlfriend (Default)

[personal profile] exor674 2009-11-20 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
No change -- I'll try tomorrow and see if it's a stale cache on google's end or something.
exor674: Computer Science is my girlfriend (Default)

[personal profile] exor674 2009-11-20 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Worked today. So might want to advise people they have to wait a few hours before pushing.

HMvBZesHkCOAfUHlc

(Anonymous) 2012-05-03 07:06 am (UTC)(link)
Repeats every 1 day was not intuitive to me what the seoncd box was for. At first, I assumed it was how many days it would repeat and I was thinking this is a bad way to set the number of days. I am not sure the Repeats every n days is worth having on there.-Is never the right default for when the entry ends? I would suggest that if its daily, the following day would be a good default 2 day events are more common than never ending events. If its weekly, maybe never is the right default but indefinitely is probably the more accurate term. It repeats until we cancel it, but we aren't sure when that will be, so its indefinite.

mJvWkcgXhYAim

(Anonymous) 2011-08-14 11:42 am (UTC)(link)
Never would have thunk I would find this so inidspnesable.

KpxdYhDuOEgHv

(Anonymous) 2012-05-04 10:29 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you so much for providing indudivials with an extraordinarily marvellous possiblity to check tips from this blog. It's always so superb and full of a great time for me personally and my office co-workers to visit your web site at the least thrice a week to read through the new tips you will have. And definitely, I'm also actually satisfied with your brilliant hints you serve. Certain 4 tips in this article are rather the very best we have had.